April Fools’ Day in Spain is allowed on December 28, April Fools’ Day; in the Anglo-Saxon world they are on April 1, April Fools’ Day. Every year, joke articles decorate ArXiv, the most famous scripting server (preprints). Many scientists do not like this custom, but on Twitter I usually repeat what I detect. April 1, 2023 was a Saturday, so they were scheduled to appear on arXiv on Monday, April 3; but they appeared from Thursday, March 29th to Tuesday, April 4th. There’s not much point in reading these articles; however, some are funny and most are curious. Of course, if you don’t like these jokes, you shouldn’t read this article any further.

The spherical cow is the epitome of physics jokes. This illustration of a cow in an astronaut suit is the centerpiece of the joke that dark energy is the result of the disintegration of primary cattle herdsthe so called μ cosmological theory (moo moo). Of course, it is assumed that the theory is based on the most recent JWST observations. Of course, no mechanism for the formation of these primordial cows is proposed, nor is any mechanism for their disintegration. The innocent one is Will J. Roper, Stephen M. Wilkins, …, Jussi Kuusisto, “Galaxy Evolution in μ based Cosmoologies,” arXiv:2303.17002 [astro-ph.GA] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17002.

String theory tends to be the usual April Fools’ Day protagonist among physicists. This year we have a review article of all the strong proposals for a compaction in string theory that leads to a de Sitter-type spacetime (with positive cosmological constant). As you well know, there isn’t, so the article is blank (100 blank pages after the first page). Of course, it is signed by famous string musicians, Iosif Bena, Mariana Graña, Thomas Van Riet, “Trustworthy de Sitter compactifications of string theory: a comprehensive review,” arXiv:2303.17680 [hep-th] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17680.

As every year, you can refer to the list of innocents on arXiv by Peter B. Denton, “April Fools’ Articles” web. By the way, I’ve included some additional ones here, as well as some almost innocent ones.

Everyone knows that laptop power cords get tangled up (apparently). It is proposed to elevate this observation to a physical law: the most probable minimum energy state of the cables is to be coiled; to support this law is illustrated with photographs of the Apple MacBook. The innocent with this proposal includes a filler image generated by stable diffusionwhy every contemporary scientific article must include a mention of machine learning (machine learning). Ryan Dorrill, Jiffy Felis, “Macroscopic Dynamics of Entangled 3+1-Dimensional Systems: A Novel Investigation Into Why My MacBook Cable Tangles in My Backpack Every Day,” arXiv:2304.00220 [physics.ins-det] (April 1, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00220.

One family of dark matter candidates is the MACHOs (Halo Compact Massive Objects); for example, primordial black holes with sublunar mass are MALE not yet ruled out. As a joke, they propose the MaMAs as a new candidate (Massive Mega-Axions), which would be axion-like particles with mass on the 10 kg scale. To reach this conclusion, they rely on the (hypothesis) that dark matter is responsible for (hypothetical) human spontaneous combustion. In that case, they propose that all known dark matter candidates be discarded; that is, this idea should be discarded. The only way to save this funny idea is a new candidate, the MaMAs; of course, to complete the joke, they claim that MaMAs are a prediction of string theory. The innocent one is Frederic V. Hessman, J. Craig Wheeler, “Spontaneous Human Combustion rules out all default candidates for Dark Matter,” arXiv:2304.00319 [hep-ph] (April 1, 2023), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00319.

A classic joke article that is difficult to read because of the orange background color of the text, but which, when glanced at, says nothing, pure verbiage, is the innocent by Ste Berta, Avril de Poisson, …, Saul Fools, “ The most fundamental question of all time,” arXiv:2304.01011 [astro-ph.CO] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.01011.

ChatGPT is the subject of several April Fools on arXiv this year. An empirical study on the number of gravitational waves detected so far according to this artificial intelligence stands out: the number changes depending on the question between 67 and 100. In addition, you must predict how many will be detected in the LVK O3 (the third collection of LIGO-Virgo-Kagra data). A curious joke by Floor S. Broekgaarden, “ChatGPT scores a bad bird at gravitational wave chirp count”, arXiv:2303.17628 [astro-ph.HE] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17628.

Using ChatGPT, the authors say, they wrote a paper on the numbers of viscachas (rodents) and vicuñas (camelids) observed during two months at the Polarbear and Simons Array observatories in the Atacama Desert, Chile. The innocent one is Praween Siritanasak, Ian Birdwell, …, Macaroni Kijsanayotin, “Predictive power of daily sightings of viscacha and vicuña in the results of work at the Simons Array site”, arXiv:2304.00351 [astro-ph.IM] (April 1, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00351.

Combining text generated by ChatGPT and images from Stable Diffusion, with comments from the authors, produces a joke with what could be an example of the future of article writing in astrophysics (at least for jokes): Samuel T. Spencer , Vikas Joshi, Alison MW Mitchell, “Can AI take the work out of gamma-ray astrophysicists?” arXiv:2303.17853 [physics.pop-ph] (March 31, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17853.

We’ve observed over 5,300 exoplanets, but there’s only one exomoon candidate; the reason is obvious, its size. As a joke, it is proposed that moons are unstable and end up crashing into their planets; moreover, it is proposed that this idea explains the Fermi paradox. Short and Unfunny Can-do by Casey Brinkman, Keyan Gootkin, …, Linnea Wolniewicz, “MO0NFALL: The Great Filter and Exo-Moon Occurrence,” arXiv:2303.18227 [astro-ph.EP] (March 31, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18227.

It is proposed to rename stars, planets and moons as “stars” of different types, namely star-like “stars”, rocky moon-like “stars” and rock-like lunar “stars”. The article with this “physics-inspired” nomenclature is Jason T. Wright, “A Unified Nomenclature and Taxonomy for Planets, Stars, and Moons,” arXiv:2303.18217 [astro-ph.EP] (March 31, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18217.

The solar and lunar calendars do not coincide, as the year has 12,368 synodic months. A “Truly Happy New Year” is defined as the year in which the number of synodic months is integer; the next will be in about 252 million years. The article is Mark Popinchalk, “Party Planning the Next True Happy New Year: Lunar Orbital Evolution Epochs with Integer Synodic Months Per Year,” arXiv:2303.17697 [astro-ph.EP] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17697.

What is the total density of chickens in the Universe? Napkin count is easy and leads to 10−21 chickens per cubic parsec. The calculation is in April Fool, by Rachel Losacco, Zachary Claytor, “Nuggets of Wisdom: Determining an Upper Limit on the Number Density of Chickens in the Universe,” arXiv:2303.17626 [astro-ph.EP] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17626.

You murdered Conan O’Brien (host of a night show)? The statistical theory of inference makes it possible to quantify the answer to this question; at least if the murder can be described with an Ising model. She tells us this in her new and innocent Eve Armstrong, “I Murdered Conan O’Brien and Nobody Will Ever Know — an exercise in inference sabotage,” arXiv:2303.17400 [astro-ph.HE] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17400.

Does the number of commas in your title influence the number of citations of an article in Astronomy? The correlation is weak, so it influences very little; They tell us about it in Joanne Tan’s innocent Tie Sien Suk, “As a matter of two points: I’m NOT into raunchy titles (no, but actually I am :>),” arXiv:2303.17059 [astro-ph.IM] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17059.

The planetary theory of everything explains all the problems of cosmology using exoplanets; dark matter, dark energy, the problem of the cosmological constant are solved in this game using an exaggerated population of exoplanets. The Playful April Fool is by JJ Charfman Jr., MMM, …, AM Avsar, “On The Planetary Theory of Everything,” arXiv:2303.17035 [astro-ph.EP] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17035.

Figures with Matplotlib’s xkcd environment are one of the hallmarks of April Fools’ Day on arXiv. This year they appear in a joke that proposes a new nomenclature for the so-called tails (tails) of open star clusters (such as NGC 752). The Innocent Is Henri MJ Boffin, “When Tails Tell Tales,” arXiv:2303.16941 [astro-ph.SR] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.16941.

The transit method for detecting exoplanets is based on observing a dip in a star’s light curve. This curve could be explained if the stars were prismatic (with 1:1/8:1 ratios) instead of spherical; as a name for this hypothetical type of star that the author proposes is square (instead of star) and the squellar model (instead of stellar). The innocent one is Charity Woodrum, Raphael E. Hviding, …, Katie Chamberlain, “A Modest Proposal for the Non-existence of Exoplanets: The Expansion of Stellar Physics to Include Squars,” arXiv:2303.16915 [astro-ph.EP] (March 29, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.16915.

UFOs (UFOs) are another star theme on April Fools’ Day each year. A correlation between UFO sightings and stratospheric balloons has been proposed, which may be associated with certain jet streams in the atmosphere; although it is also interpreted as a sign of a possible navigation path for extraterrestrial spacecraft on our planet. The April Fool is by Michael B. Lund, “UFOs: Just Hot Air or Something Meteor?” arXiv:2303.17103 [physics.pop-ph] (March 30, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17103.

The author may be claiming it’s not an April Fool’s joke, but this incorrect proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem for odd prime numbers sounds like: Zenon B. Batang, “On Fermat’s Last Theorem for odd prime exponents,” arXiv:2304.00230 [math.GM] (April 1, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00230. I encourage readers who enjoy math puzzles to reveal the error in this incorrect proof.

And finally, the article on negative reflection in metamaterials by Bibinur Meirbekova, …, Michele Brun, Giorgio Carta, “The strange case of negative reflection”, arXiv:2304.00281 also seems innocent. [physics.class-ph] (April 1, 2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.00281. Their numerical simulations seem to indicate that there is more work than expected for a fool; but your discussion of the results strikes me as much more innocent than expected.

I don’t expect you to read any of these articles; unless you want to spend some dead time entertaining. The purpose of April Fools’ Day on arXiv is to entertain. If you dare, enjoy them!